Case study · Fast-growth technology group
A legal function that moves with the business.
A fast-growth technology group needed legal support that could keep pace with new ventures, senior hires, proprietary technology development, creator and ambassador programmes, contractor models, regulatory issues and strategic transactions — without creating friction. The outsourced model gave it a flexible senior legal function without building an in-house team.
- Senior counsel
- Without building an in-house team
- New JV
- Structured to keep a future exit open
- Tech owned
- Contractor-built IP assigned to the group
- Repeatable
- Frameworks for creators and contractors
The risk
Growth outpacing the paperwork behind it.
Groups that scale quickly sign ventures, hire senior people on flexible terms and build technology through contractors — often faster than anyone documents who owns what, who decides what, and what happens on a future sale.
Every one of those gaps surfaces later: in diligence, in an investment round, or in the middle of a regulatory incident when there is no time to brief a new adviser.
Before
Where the group stood
Legal capacity
- Advisers briefed from scratch each time an issue arose
- No senior legal view sitting inside commercial decisions
Ventures
- A strategic joint venture to structure with a commercial partner
- Risk of open-ended funding and operational ambiguity
Technology
- Proprietary technology acquired and built by external contractors
- Ownership of underlying rights undocumented
Senior people
- Executives engaged flexibly rather than as employees
- IR35, substitution and control risks unaddressed
Contracting volume
- Creators, ambassadors, traders and contractors onboarded ad hoc
- Contracts rebuilt for every new relationship
Risk
- A live data protection incident and regulatory reporting duties
- Reputational and operational exposure across multiple entities
After
Where the work landed
Legal capacity
- A flexible senior legal function moving at the pace of the business
- Issues assessed in the wider commercial context, not in isolation
Ventures
- Shareholders' agreement, governance and board control in place
- Funding obligations capped and non-compete protections negotiated
Technology
- Contractor agreements and IP assignments securing ownership
- Existing technology acquisition and knowledge transfer documented
Senior people
- Bespoke executive consultancy agreements with bonus and termination terms
- Engagement models aligned to real working practices
Contracting volume
- Reusable frameworks and onboarding for creators, ambassadors and contractors
- Multiple models for revenue splits, retainers and non-retainers
Risk
- Rapid response on the data incident and regulatory reporting
- Privacy, contractor-status and operational risk handled in-flight
The result
Legal as growth infrastructure.
Rather than engaging lawyers only when something went wrong, legal support became part of how the group grew — helping structure ventures, secure technology, standardise contracting, manage risk and support commercial decision-making as the business scaled across multiple entities.
How it was structured
Ventures, IP, people, governance
A major workstream was structuring a new joint venture with a strategic commercial partner: drafting and negotiating the initial commercial framework, preparing the shareholders' agreement, structuring governance and board control, defining future funding obligations, negotiating non-compete protections, addressing operational and resource commitments, preparing implementation documents and coordinating with accountants and other advisers.
Particular focus went on protecting the group's strategic influence, limiting open-ended funding exposure, avoiding operational ambiguity and preserving flexibility on a future group sale. Exit provisions were structured so the joint venture could grow without becoming an obstacle to a later transaction involving the wider group.
The group was acquiring and developing proprietary technology using external contractors, which raised the critical ownership question. Work covered contractor agreements, IP assignment documentation, documenting the acquisition of existing technology, securing ownership of underlying rights, addressing future development, dealing with knowledge transfer and ensuring continued development did not undermine ownership.
Technology created outside the traditional employee model became a clearly owned corporate asset — reducing the risk of ownership disputes, dependency on individual developers, uncertainty during investment, problems in due diligence and complications on a future sale.
As the senior team grew, bespoke arrangements were prepared for senior operational and commercial roles: executive consultancy agreements, bonus structures, negotiated commercial terms, misconduct and termination protections, contractor status, review of practical working arrangements and management of negotiation rounds with senior personnel.
Separate advice addressed IR35 risk, substitution, control, deliverables-based engagement models and employment-style working practices. The company could attract senior leadership using structures suited to a fast-growth business, with documents aligned to the commercial reality of the roles rather than generic employment templates.
Reusable frameworks were created for creators, influencers, ambassadors, traders, contractors and senior consultants. For creator and ambassador relationships the framework covered services and deliverables, compensation structures, content requirements, brand use, rights and ownership, termination and a reusable onboarding process.
For other commercial programmes, multiple contractual models supported different revenue splits, retainer and non-retainer structures and commercial arrangements. The business stopped recreating contracts for every relationship and gained repeatable infrastructure capable of supporting higher transaction volumes.
As the organisation became more complex, attention turned to who controlled important decisions. Mechanisms included board governance, shareholder controls, approval rights, funding protections, operational obligations, executive responsibilities, termination rights and restrictions on competing activity. The group retained strategic oversight while individual ventures, executives and commercial partners kept enough operational freedom — a balance that mattered more as the group expanded across multiple entities and external relationships.
The outsourced function was also there for issues beyond contracting: responding to a live data protection incident, assisting with regulatory reporting, privacy and risk-management advice, reputational risk support, contractor-status risk, operational contracting issues and shared-office arrangements. The company did not need to find and brief a new adviser each time something arose, and existing knowledge of the business meant problems were considered in their wider commercial context.
The engagement included negotiating live commercial issues, helping management evaluate deal terms, advising where risk could be accepted, identifying points worth protecting, coordinating with counterparties and advisers, supporting negotiations through to completion and acting as an ongoing sounding board. The question was never simply "is this legally acceptable?" — it was "does this structure support the commercial objective, and what needs to change to get the deal done safely?"
Strategic takeaway
What made the difference
Transactions
Structuring strategic ventures and partnerships so they support, rather than constrain, the group's future.
IP
Securing ownership of proprietary technology built outside the employee model.
People
Flexible senior leadership and contractor structures that match how the roles actually work.
Growth channels
Scalable creator, ambassador and contractor frameworks built for volume.
Governance
Protecting control and future exit flexibility across multiple entities.
Risk
Rapid support when regulatory or operational issues arose, from an adviser who already knew the business.
Details have been generalised to protect confidentiality. This case study is not legal advice.
What does your business need next?
No complicated brief required. Start with the problem.